What UNR does, and why

Portland grassroots group United Neighborhoods for Reform seeks to stem the demolition of viable, affordable housing and its replacement with expensive and inefficient large single-family homes. Our demolition/development resolution, developed through significant neighbor outreach, gathered endorsements from 43 neighborhood associations citywide. We also regularly take our message to City Hall, starting in December 2014, continuing in 2015 on Feb. 12, June 3 (UNR presenters start at 51:20), Oct. 14 (UNR at 1:07:35), and Nov. 25 (UNR at 1:05); in 2016 on Feb. 17, Nov. 9 and 16, and Dec. 7; and in 2017 on May 17.

Next up: A whole lotta "engagement theatre" arrives in form of Residential Infill Project open houses
• 5-7 pm Thursday, Oct. 19, Northeast Coalition of Neighborhoods, 4815 NE 7th Ave.
• 5-7 pm Monday, Oct. 23, Central Northeast Neighbors, 4415 NE 87th Ave.
• 5-7:30 pm Monday, Oct. 30, Multnomah Arts Center, 7688 SW Capitol Highway
• 5-7:30 pm Thursday, Nov. 2, Kenton Fire House, 8105 N. Brandon
• 5-7:30 pm Tuesday, Nov. 7, Southeast Uplift, 3524 SE Main.
Written comment to: residential.infill@portlandoregon.gov and/or City of Portland Bureau of Planning, Attn: RIP, 1900 SW 4th Ave., Suite 7100, Portland, OR 97201.

"The time is always right to do what is right."
—Martin Luther King Jr.

Saturday, December 26, 2015

Resolve to make real change in 2016

It's been quite a month for demolitions and the politicking around them. First, the dread demo tax: United Neighborhoods for Reform (UNR) members spoke in favor of it at City Hall as one of many tools to stem the destructive and destabilizing forces of demolition citywide.

Local news station KGW ran this chart on home demos in Portland, showing
the increasing destruction from 2010 (data for 2015 remains incomplete).
Casual readers of this graphic can see that there were twice as many
demolitions last year than in 2010 and 2011. Note: The data does not capture
the "bulldozer remodels," also prevalent and on the increase. More stats here.
Predictably, members of the Development Review Advisory Committee, or DRAC—still smarting they weren't included in discussions of the tax before it went to council Nov. 25—came down hard against it. They sent emissary Claire Carder to wonder (at 1:58 here), "Is the city really undergoing loss of housing that is higher than ever before? I don't know. Is this the crisis, really?" Ignoring all evidence to the contrary, she also said, "Is there really a demolition crisis? We have numbers, but we don't really know what they mean."

With a bit of googling (and I'm sure Carder has more resources at her disposal, because DRAC works under the aegis of the Bureau of Development Services), I found the above chart showing the numbers of Portland's demolitions, with the year 2015 not fully reported yet. Bear in mind these "demolitions" don't include the "remodels" that have the effect of demolition.
Epidemic—what epidemic? DRAC's Claire Carder (left)
can't grasp what the demo numbers mean. Brian Emerick
of the city's esteemed Historic Landmarks Commission
coined Portland's "demolition epidemic" in July 2014.

Carder is the rep for the "neighborhood coalition land use committees" on DRAC. With nearly half of the city's neighborhood associations on board with the UNR resolution to curb demolitions, how is she forming her opinions?

Luckily, Peggy Moretti of Restore Oregon piped up to say, "We do believe it is an epidemic just by the escalating numbers that we have tracked." Further, she noted: "The demolition tax aligns with [Portland's] sustainability goals. It should hurt to dump that much in the landfill." The mill in Newberg that used to burn our old-growth homes closed last month; now all that classic Portland architecture and history will fill our landfill. Portlanders love to recycle, but the short-term investor-developers plying our neighborhoods don't.

If you watch the City Council proceedings, don't miss Paul Grove of the Home Builders Association (HBA), thoroughly stumped by questioning of Commissioner Nick Fish at 2:18. He later showed up—or a doppelgänger anyway—at the Dec. 1 meeting of the Residential Infill Project stakeholder advisory committee (RIP SAC), where he sighed and writhed on the sidelines when not poking his HBA brethren on the committee. He left at the half, presumably disgusted by the threat to business as usual.

It's time to show up and speak up

Speaking of the city's Residential Infill Project, its members soldier on to create improved guidelines for new construction. If demolitions continue to occur at such an increasing rate (and again, the chart above shows so), it may be better to shape what comes in their wake, and therefore disincentivize the destruction in the first place.

Hillary Dames of South Burlingame gets vocal and visual at the Dec. 1 meeting of the Residential Infill Project.
Join her and others demanding improvements in new development.
From the beginning, activists from South Burlingame have voiced concerns about the size and effect of new construction in their neighborhood (one project there is called the "Costco"). This time they brought their neighborhood land use chair, who said he heard (from the new neighbors themselves) and saw that the people buying the maximum build-outs were having a hard time integrating. Anecdotally, we've noticed that buyers of the new homes don't stay long. Buyers of older, original construction stay many years or decades, put down roots, and form lasting relationships with their neighbors and neighborhoods. Demolitions destabilize healthy, strong, and connected neighborhoods.

At the Dec. 1 meeting, during the 10-minute public comment period that followed the city's 2-hour comment period, activists from South Burlingame again made their points. Afterward, a member of the committee intimated that these problems might be unique to South Burlingame and not experienced by neighborhoods throughout the city. Residents of other neighborhoods used to sit and nod at the analysis and comments out of South Burlingame, feeling no need to stand up and reiterate, but that must change.

The committee needs to hear from every aggrieved neighbor and neighborhood to believe problems with new development occur citywide.

On Northeast Alameda, a vintage home (below) becomes
an eyesore and a safety hazard (above) courtesy
Everett Custom Homes.
There's the cue, dear readers. While making your resolutions for 2016, won't you resolve to take the time to tell the committee what you're seeing in your neighborhood, how you feel about it, and how it should change? If anything you will be inspired by the other neighbors, and hopefully by the work under way. Details for the next meeting of the committee are in the banner of this blog, where others also will be announced. For the Jan. 5 meeting public comment is being taken at the beginning of the meeting, or 6:10 p.m. to be exact. Or contact Julia Gisler (503-823-7624 or julia.gisler@portlandoregon.gov) for a schedule.

Wasting Portland for what?

As proof of how little the out-of-town outfits value the legacy, history, and quality of Portland's classic built environment, Everett Custom Homes now erases housing just to put the land up for sale. This in a city that recently declared a "housing emergency."

As elsewhere in other neighborhoods, Everett took down this home on Northeast Alameda, leaving a trash-ridden plot of land with an open trench next to the sidewalk.

Recently City Council heard from a man who because of his sight disability can't easily navigate construction sites or sidewalk closures. As with the continued lack of hazmat control at demo sites, lack of enforcement of building codes (this even came up at RIP SAC where city staff noticed their slide show was full of non-code compliant projects and yet no corrections occurred), and disregard for elemental safety precautions, one wonders who's calling the shots and who among our city leaders can and will stand up for Portland residents.

The last word on the demo tax

Maybe you're still wondering about that demo tax. Wonder no more. After its last presentation at City Hall in November, the mayor himself seemed to give up on it. Why else would he give the idea to DRAC for fine-tuning? These are the folks who can't make sense of a bar chart showing a rising number of demolitions, and who can't acknowledge the demolition epidemic first announced in summer 2014 by the city's own Historic Landmarks Commission.

Then we learned the demo tax is itself demolished. This means that more than ever, we need the demo moratorium to hit the pause button, do some fresh thinking, and ensure priorities align with action. We need more voices at the RIP SAC. And we need people on the front lines to protect the public from life-changing health hazards (read on).

Something's hard at work in your city, but it's the dark side and hard to see. This isn't Star Wars, but UNR is proud to be part of the Earth-bound resistance movement. We want to keep what's good in Portland, and build better.

Public safety's on us

Early next year, UNR, the Beaumont-Wilshire Neighborhood Association, and the Lead Safe America Foundation team up to screen a film on lead poisoning and to recruit activists who will help neighbors, especially kids, avoid exposure to hazardous materials during demolitions.

With demos spiking as they are (again, see graphic at top of this post), is this avoidable fallout reason why Johnny and Jane can't read? Could it be a contributing factor in Portland Public Schools' abysmal graduation rate? Come to the Hollywood Theatre on Feb. 29 to learn more and be the change you wish to see. Check the blog banner at top for details as we cement them.

Thank you to Central Northeast Neighbors for the grant that makes this effort possible.

Here's to a happy, healthy, and safer 2016!

No comments:

Post a Comment